No templates to maintain
Unlike Affinda, Docusift does not ask you to draw bounding boxes or maintain per-vendor templates. Every layout is parsed visually.
Docusift vs Affinda
Docusift vs Affinda
Affinda is a document-AI API with an extractor per document type, widely used for resume parsing and invoice extraction. Docusift takes a different approach: zero templates, zero model training, a single REST endpoint, and pricing that scales with pages — not seats or minimums.
Affinda is a document-AI API with an extractor per document type, widely used for resume parsing and invoice extraction. The gap teams run into: coverage is one extractor per document type, so a type without a matching extractor means a configured or custom one.
Docusift takes the opposite approach. Docusift reads any document type through a single endpoint with no per-type extractor to build, and hands you a direct accounting push. You get full line-item extraction on any layout, a per-field confidence score on every value, per-page pricing with a free tier of 100 pages a month, and a direct push to QuickBooks and Xero.
Docusift vs Affinda, side by side
| Dimension | Docusift | Affinda |
|---|---|---|
| Setup | None — drop any document in, no templates or training | Per-document-type extractors, custom builder for the rest |
| Pricing model | Per-page, free tier of 100 pages/month, no seat fees | Usage-based API pricing |
| Line-item extraction | Full line items on every document type | On the document types with a matching extractor |
| Document coverage | Any layout, any document type — format-agnostic | One extractor per document type |
| Accounting push | Direct push to QuickBooks and Xero | API only — you build the accounting push |
Why teams choose Docusift
No model training
Skip the labeled-data treadmill. Docusift recognizes hundreds of document types out of the box and accepts custom fields via a single sentence.
Built for automation
Single REST endpoint, deterministic JSON, seconds per document. Drop into workflow automation or your own agent stack.
Transparent per-page pricing
No seat fees, no minimums, no enterprise-only features hidden behind sales calls. Free tier covers 100 pages per month.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best alternative to Affinda?
Docusift is the leading alternative to Affinda for teams that want zero-setup document extraction. Affinda is a document-AI API with an extractor per document type, widely used for resume parsing and invoice extraction. Docusift reads layouts visually with no template configuration, prices per page, and ships a free tier covering 100 pages per month.
Is Docusift cheaper than Affinda?
Docusift bills per page processed with no seat fees, no minimums, and a free tier of 100 pages per month. Most teams find the per-page model cheaper than Affinda's seat-based or template-tier pricing once their document volume crosses a few hundred pages a month.
Can I migrate from Affinda to Docusift?
Yes. Most teams migrate by pointing their existing pipeline at Docusift's REST endpoint — there are no templates to port and no models to retrain. The migration playbook is at /template-free-extraction-guide.
Why move off Affinda?
Teams move off Affinda when the per-vendor template overhead, the labeled-data treadmill, or the seat-based pricing stops scaling. Docusift removes all three: visual parsing, no labels, per-page billing.
Do I need to train a model first?
No. Docusift recognizes hundreds of document types out of the box. Custom fields are configured with a single sentence — no labeled training data required.
How is pricing calculated?
Pay per page processed. There is a free tier for evaluation and volume discounts for production workloads. No seat fees.
Can Docusift handle scanned or photographed documents?
Yes. The pipeline runs OCR + layout analysis + extraction in one pass, so scans, mobile photos, and native PDFs all flow through the same endpoint.
Related comparisons
Try Docusift instead of Affinda
Free tier includes 100 pages per month. No credit card required.
Start free — no credit card